Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

It's also important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual size of service pretty much violates your entire service composition like a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention of your legislation nor from the equity. Read more

If your DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and continue according into the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.

Inside the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court from the United States. Decreased courts within the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, along with the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related for the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that include parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every state has its personal judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Just about every state is usually referred to as the “supreme” court, Whilst there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Even though state courts may additionally generally hear cases involving federal laws.

Numerous judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based to the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more

Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, such as the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, providing a useful resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to the offender as well as the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots click here of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.

Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.